Amazon vs. Rainforest

0
Share

Amazon vs. Rainforest

For over seven years, Amazon and the ACTO (the Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization made up of Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Surinam and Venezuela) has been battling over rights to the ‘.amazon.’ top-level domain (TLD) name.

 

The disagreement started when Amazon asked ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) for the exclusive use of .amazon to “protect and solidify their web presence”. In response, the ACTO nations said this would violate their sovereignty and tried to keep the TLD out of Amazon’s hands. 

 

A lot of back and forth later showed that ACTO was much more protective of the domain name than the Amazon itself and that no agreement was going to be reached. 

 

An obvious solution would seem to share the domain, where river.amazon doesn’t sell books, and kindle.amazon doesn’t organise wild water rafting. But, unfortunately, such an agreement was not reached as the “no, I need all the toys even if I’m not using them” strategy applied. 

 

As a result, ICANN recently announced it was going to proceed with the designation request by Amazon Inc after no agreement was reached. 

 

Some say geographical locations should take precedence over private businesses when it comes to TLDs and Amazon already uses amazon.com, so the TLD seems redundant. No one is going to confuse www.amazon.com with www.burnttoacrisp.amazon, after all. 

 

Others say that if ICANN rules against Amazon, it would be going against its own guidelines and that ACTO has had enough time to come up with reasonable proposals. As a result, and in fear of being sued by Amazon, ICANN is now likely to grant the TLD to Amazon Inc.

 

Even though the actual Amazon has been in the news more than the domain name, the seven year-long discussions have riled up the international community more than the burning rainforest ever managed. 

 

Not surprisingly, the ACTO 8 have been trying to hold back the decision and enjoyed support from China, Russia and India. Not only because justice and transparency are what drives Russian and Chinese foreign policy, but because virtual turf wars are just as exciting as real ones. There’s less cleaning up involved too. 

 

Meanwhile, the US and some European countries have supported the e-commerce giant, because, well, where else is Amazon not going to pay any tax. 

 

But, Amazon didn’t want to make enemies out of the ACTO countries, and offered $5 million worth of Kindle e-readers if they dropped the opposition in 2018. How ironic. 

 

Not surprisingly, the countries weren’t swayed by the offer, although Venezuela’s Maduro was probably tempted to use them to feed his population at this point. 

 

Despite all the shouting back and forth, it is questionable how a domain name would affect rainforest-Amazon or twice-the-value-of-Argentina-Amazon. The Atlantic newspaper doesn’t belong to all nations adjacent to it, nor does Apple now own all apples in the world. 

 

Still, who’d have thought that one day the world would be bickering over a domain name – the internet doesn’t need oxygen. Right? 

Related Posts
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.